Vleugels van Hoop

 
Vleugels van Hoop
 
Welcome - Who are we? - How to help? - Projects - Actions - Press New - Contact us - FAQ

 

 


pâturage
Pastures 2008

Pastures 2008
Follow-up of the project
Images

 

 

 

 

PROJECT Implantation pastures with turnover of feed plants
for the benefit of cattle holders in the Kigali district


1. NAMING AND CATEGORY.

Project to implant a pasture with as turnover the production of feed plants
for the benefit of cattle holders.

Initiators

CENTRE MEMORIAL GISIMBA
B.P.1433 KIGALI

Personne de contact : MUTEZINTARE GISIMBA Damas (foto)
                                KARAYENGA Jean Jacques

Damas Gisimba

Location planned activities

Province

Marie de la Ville de Kigali

District

Nyarugenge

Secteur

Mageragere (partie rurale)

Beneficiaries

direct: initiators (turnover); breeders of cows and sheeps (cattle food)
indirect: young unemployed persons (employment); the State (taxes)

Planned duration of the project

1 year (financing in application phase)

Start date immediately, at receipt of means

Costs

Total costs of the project 5.273.000 RwFr 6.675 Euro
Participation initiators 1.000.000 RwFr    - 866 Euro
Needed funds  4.273 000 RwFr  5.809 Euro


Silent partner (collection of funds) : 'VLEUGELS van HOOP' vzw

2.   DETAILLED PRESENTATION OF THE PROJECT 

Objective of the project

General

Establishment of pastures to breed feed plants to generate an income for the initiators

Specific

     Produce & multiply seeds of different feed plants
     Establishing of permanent pastures (dry soil)
     Improvement of the feed plants quality
     Creation of employment for young people

3.  JUSTIFICATION OF THE PROJECT 

The region was confronted with several problems, as traumas, youngsters with HIV/AIDS, on top of problems of psychological nature. Since the beginning of 2006, the region couldn’t avoid to end up in debts because of decrease of offered help by some silent partners.
The usage as well as the expenses although kept on increasing remarkable wit hall negative consequences.

In solve this situation of financial dependency the promoters/initiators have developed a ‘reproduction project’ to justify received subsidies. This project is the establishment of pastures for feed plants for cattle in conformity with the national policy that obliges all stock breeders to follow the system of modern stockbreeding and demands the use of better fertilizers to optimize the result. Taking into account the situation in the district, as there are a lot of stock breeders the most important problem is the inadequacy of pastures.

Starting from the modern technique of planting and taking into account the food needs of the cattle in our district, we want establish a pasture of 6ha of which 4ha sheer and 2ha tripsacum.

The choice of these feed plants originates from the fact that the two chosen categories adapt to for Kigali applying weather circumstances and moreover would survive longer periods without rain.

This pasture belongs to the rustic district of large Kigali. We want to rent the areas and the income from this project will contribute to the implementation of the daily activities of the local population; the financial tensions will diminish because of this.

The financing question is one-off at start up; after the first functioning year the project will be self-maintainable.

4.  MODALITIES & SCHEME OF PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 

                                         Month
Activities

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

Collection funds/financing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contacts/procedures – signing contract with silent partners

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Action : search and rent the pastures, signing contracts with the owners

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recruitment of employers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plough pastures and buying seeds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Planting

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weeding and organically fertilizing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1st sale of grasses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Follow-up / evaluation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reporting

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Auto financing project

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                       

  1. COSTS OF THE PROJECT 

List of expenses to finance by silent partner

Naming

       Number

Unit price Rwandese Franks

       Total

Material 

 

 

 

Chop

30

3000

90000

Chop knife

30

2000

60000

Pickaxe

30

3000

90000

Wheelbarrow

6

30000

180000

Wire

20

1500

30000

 

30

2500

75000

Watering can

18

2000

36000

Subtotal

 

 

561 000

Rent pastures

6ha

100000

600000

Subtotal

 

 

600 000

Raw materials 

 

Purchase of seeds

6.000

10

60000

Purchase of tripsacum seeds

10.000

10

100000

Purchase of organic fertilizers

800 kgrs

100

800000

Subtotal

 

 

960 000

Loans & several expenditures

 

 

 

Hand labor treating ground

100/hax6

800

480000

Hand labor planting

80/hax6

800

432000

Hand labor weeding

100/hax6

800

480000

Salary agricultural expert

1x12 mois

80.000

960000

Supervisor (premie)

3 fois/an

100.000

300000

Transport material

ff

500.000

500000

Subtotal

 

 

3 152 000

End total of the  project

 

 

5 273 000

 

 

 

 

End total of the project  
EURO
6 675
Contribution initiators  
EURO
866
Needed funds  
EURO
5 809


6.  PROFITABILITY OF THE PROJECT

        

The profitability of this project is expected 8 month after start.
Concerning the cultivation: one renews the planting after 3 years, therefore the expenses reduce year by year.
One cuts the grasses for the cattle 3 times a year. 1 hectare grass costs 300.000RwFr. (every time). One cuts and harvests 6 ha (=1.800.000RwFr) 3 times i.e. 5.400.000 RwFr/year.

We also consider selling the seeds to external farmers.
The forecasted profit = 600.000 RwFr/year

This gives a total of 5.400.000 RwFr + 600.000 RwFr  =  6.000.000 RwFr

7.  EXPECTED RESULT

At the end of the project:

  • Increasing source of income
  • Decreasing financial problems
  • Employment for youngsters in the district

8.  RISK

The target aimed for would not be reached in case of lack of external financial means.

9.  CONSEQUENCE

The consequence of the district is drastically decrease the financial dependency towards external partners because due to this project the monthly source of income will increase. n.

10. FOLLOW-UP & EVALUATION

The promoter/initiator does a detailed follow-up of the project and provides the silent partner with enough information. He will send a report per quartile towards the silent partner.

The silent partner will regularly evaluate the project, while it is ongoing and at the end.


Follow-up of the project

See images
Images

Inplantation pastures.

Gisimba Gisimba

Vleugels Kigali Vleugels in Kigali


Top

Back to Projectpage